Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty

Journal Article
Authors

Nate Breznau

Eike Mark Rinke

Alexander Wuttke

Hung H. V. Nguyen

Muna Adem

Jule Adriaans

Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea

Henrik K. Andersen

Daniel Auer

Flavio Azevedo

Oke Bahnsen

Dave Balzer

Gerrit Bauer

Paul C. Bauer

Markus Baumann

Sharon Baute

Verena Benoit

Julian Bernauer

Carl Berning

Anna Berthold

Felix S. Bethke

Thomas Biegert

Katharina Blinzler

Johannes N. Blumenberg

Licia Bobzien

Andrea Bohman

Thijs Bol

Amie Bostic

Zuzanna Brzozowska

Katharina Burgdorf

Kaspar Burger

Kathrin B. Busch

Juan Carlos-Castillo

Nathan Chan

Pablo Christmann

Roxanne Connelly

Christian S. Czymara

Elena Damian

Alejandro Ecker

Achim Edelmann

Maureen A. Eger

Simon Ellerbrock

Anna Forke

Andrea Forster

Chris Gaasendam

Konstantin Gavras

Vernon Gayle

Theresa Gessler

Timo Gnambs

Amelie Godefroidt

Max Gromping

Martin Gross

Stefan Gruber

Tobias Gummer

Andreas Hadjar

Jan Paul Heisig

Sebastian Hellmeier

Stefanie Heyne

Magdalena Hirsch

Mikael Hjerm

Oshrat Hochman

Andreas Hovermann

Sophia Hunger

Christian Hunkler

Nora Huth

Zsofia S. Ignacz

Laura Jacobs

Jannes Jacobsen

Bastian Jaeger

Sebastian Jungkunz

Nils Jungmann

Mathias Kauff

Manuel Kleinert

Julia Klinger

Jan-Philipp Kolb

Marta Kolczynska

John Kuk

Katharina Kunissen

Dafina {Kurti Sinatra}

Alexander Langenkamp

Philipp M. Lersch

Lea-Maria Lobel

Philipp Lutscher

Matthias Mader

Joan E. Madia

Natalia Malancu

Luis Maldonado

Helge Marahrens

Nicole Martin

Paul Martinez

Jochen Mayerl

Oscar J. Mayorga

Patricia McManus

Kyle McWagner

Cecil Meeusen

Daniel Meierrieks

Jonathan Mellon

Friedolin Merhout

Samuel Merk

Daniel Meyer

Leticia Micheli

Jonathan Mijs

Cristobal Moya

Marcel Neunhoeffer

Daniel Nust

Olav Nygard

Fabian Ochsenfeld

Gunnar Otte

Anna O. Pechenkina

Christopher Prosser

Louis Raes

Kevin Ralston

Miguel R. Ramos

Arne Roets

Jonathan Rogers

Guido Ropers

Robin Samuel

Gregor Sand

Ariela Schachter

Merlin Schaeffer

David Schieferdecker

Elmar Schlueter

Regine Schmidt

Katja M. Schmidt

Alexander Schmidt-Catran

Claudia Schmiedeberg

Jurgen Schneider

Martijn Schoonvelde

Julia Schulte-Cloos

Sandy Schumann

Reinhard Schunck

Jurgen Schupp

Julian Seuring

Henning Silber

Willem Sleegers

Nico Sonntag

Alexander Staudt

Nadia Steiber

Nils Steiner

Sebastian Sternberg

Dieter Stiers

Dragana Stojmenovska

Nora Storz

Erich Striessnig

Anne-Kathrin Stroppe

Janna Teltemann

Andrey Tibajev

Brian Tung

Giacomo Vagni

Jasper {Van Assche}

Meta {van der Linden}

Jolanda {van der Noll}

Arno {Van Hootegem}

Stefan Vogtenhuber

Bogdan Voicu

Fieke Wagemans

Nadja Wehl

Hannah Werner

Brenton M. Wiernik

Fabian Winter

Christof Wolf

Yuki Yamada

Nan Zhang

Conrad Ziller

Stefan Zins

Tomasz Zoltak

Published

November 1, 2022

Abstract
This study explores how researchers’ analytical choices affect the reliability of scientific findings. Most discussions of reliability problems in science focus on systematic biases. We broaden the lens to emphasize the idiosyncrasy of conscious and unconscious decisions that researchers make during data analysis. We coordinated 161 researchers in 73 research teams and observed their research decisions as they used the same data to independently test the same prominent social science hypothesis: that greater immigration reduces support for social policies among the public. In this typical case of social science research, research teams reported both widely diverging numerical findings and substantive conclusions despite identical start conditions. Researchers’ expertise, prior beliefs, and expectations barely predict the wide variation in research outcomes. More than 95% of the total variance in numerical results remains unexplained even after qualitative coding of all identifiable decisions in each team’s workflow. This reveals a universe of uncertainty that remains hidden when considering a single study in isolation. The idiosyncratic nature of how researchers’ results and conclusions varied is a previously underappreciated explanation for why many scientific hypotheses remain contested. These results call for greater epistemic humility and clarity in reporting scientific findings.

How to cite this work

Nate Breznau, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Hung H. V. Nguyen, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, Henrik K. Andersen, Daniel Auer, Flavio Azevedo, Oke Bahnsen, Dave Balzer, Gerrit Bauer, Paul C. Bauer, Markus Baumann, Sharon Baute, Verena Benoit, Julian Bernauer, Carl Berning, Anna Berthold, Felix S. Bethke, Thomas Biegert, Katharina Blinzler, Johannes N. Blumenberg, Licia Bobzien, Andrea Bohman, Thijs Bol, Amie Bostic, Zuzanna Brzozowska, Katharina Burgdorf, Kaspar Burger, Kathrin B. Busch, Juan Carlos-Castillo, Nathan Chan, Pablo Christmann, Roxanne Connelly, Christian S. Czymara, Elena Damian, Alejandro Ecker, Achim Edelmann, Maureen A. Eger, Simon Ellerbrock, Anna Forke, Andrea Forster, Chris Gaasendam, Konstantin Gavras, Vernon Gayle, Theresa Gessler, Timo Gnambs, Amelie Godefroidt, Max Gromping, Martin Gross, Stefan Gruber, Tobias Gummer, Andreas Hadjar, Jan Paul Heisig, Sebastian Hellmeier, Stefanie Heyne, Magdalena Hirsch, Mikael Hjerm, Oshrat Hochman, Andreas Hovermann, Sophia Hunger, Christian Hunkler, Nora Huth, Zsofia S. Ignacz, Laura Jacobs, Jannes Jacobsen, Bastian Jaeger, Sebastian Jungkunz, Nils Jungmann, Mathias Kauff, Manuel Kleinert, Julia Klinger, Jan-Philipp Kolb, Marta Kolczynska, John Kuk, Katharina Kunissen, Dafina Kurti Sinatra, Alexander Langenkamp, Philipp M. Lersch, Lea-Maria Lobel, Philipp Lutscher, Matthias Mader, Joan E. Madia, Natalia Malancu, Luis Maldonado, Helge Marahrens, Nicole Martin, Paul Martinez, Jochen Mayerl, Oscar J. Mayorga, Patricia McManus, Kyle McWagner, Cecil Meeusen, Daniel Meierrieks, Jonathan Mellon, Friedolin Merhout, Samuel Merk, Daniel Meyer, Leticia Micheli, Jonathan Mijs, Cristobal Moya, Marcel Neunhoeffer, Daniel Nust, Olav Nygard, Fabian Ochsenfeld, Gunnar Otte, Anna O. Pechenkina, Christopher Prosser, Louis Raes, Kevin Ralston, Miguel R. Ramos, Arne Roets, Jonathan Rogers, Guido Ropers, Robin Samuel, Gregor Sand, Ariela Schachter, Merlin Schaeffer, David Schieferdecker, Elmar Schlueter, Regine Schmidt, Katja M. Schmidt, Alexander Schmidt-Catran, Claudia Schmiedeberg, Jurgen Schneider, Martijn Schoonvelde, Julia Schulte-Cloos, Sandy Schumann, Reinhard Schunck, Jurgen Schupp, Julian Seuring, Henning Silber, Willem Sleegers, Nico Sonntag, Alexander Staudt, Nadia Steiber, Nils Steiner, Sebastian Sternberg, Dieter Stiers, Dragana Stojmenovska, Nora Storz, Erich Striessnig, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Janna Teltemann, Andrey Tibajev, Brian Tung, Giacomo Vagni, Jasper Van Assche, Meta van der Linden, Jolanda van der Noll, Arno Van Hootegem, Stefan Vogtenhuber, Bogdan Voicu, Fieke Wagemans, Nadja Wehl, Hannah Werner, Brenton M. Wiernik, Fabian Winter, Christof Wolf, Yuki Yamada, Nan Zhang, Conrad Ziller, Stefan Zins, Tomasz Zoltak (2022). Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(44) e2203150119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203150119